whoa! of the wow!
WotW is, frankly, relentless. The movie is quite in tune with its nail-biting habit. So much so that the problem lies in the fact that pandemonium, mass-hysteria and sheer, constant terror probably shouldn't be maintained for almost two hours straight, for fear of seeming sadistic. If it seems like the film ends with kind of a calm, sighing breath, it is because exhaustion is the only plausible result for both its characters and its audience. I am not yet certain if this is a good or bad thing; the film is clearly well-made, as the persistent effects will attest (But is this really a concern? This is the man who brought dinosaurs so seamlessly to life in Jurassic Park.). And with the exception of Tim Robbins' bad east coast dialect and looney tune flailings (really now, if aliens were outside your door, wouldn't you know to shut up?), the actors all do a fine job of registering sixteen levels of crazed fear, horror and grief.
Yet the film really never quite lets up. Even in calmer moments, there is always some awful droning from a nearby alien vehicle, or a steadily escalating throng of citizens attempting to flee the next dusting by galactic sharecroppers. And it's a film not one whit afraid of Grand Guignol darkness. There is a panoramic shot of a valley that has been affected by what the aliens end up doing to humans, and the horizon is lit up with the colors of the result. It's quite horrifying, and not the sort of thing Spielberg excels at, but clearly should try more often. It isn't a sugar-coated, happy-slappy funtime of a movie. It is not E.T., unless E.T. became a million vampiric E.T.s, all armed with spindly-legged tripods and steel-blue death rays. But it is a tremendously powerful scare trip, and if you don't mind the lack of narrative explanation (we are to assume that the aliens arrived after monitoring Earth for so long because they needed a new take-out joint, but you don't really get enough time to consider such implausibilities) you should like it just fine.
ALSO IN THEATERS...
George A. Romero's Land of the Dead is a fine follow-up to his original Dead Trilogy. In fact, I would go as far as saying it could be the second best film of the four. Dawn, on repeat viewings, becomes a little too steadfast in its message about rampant consumerism, and the actual zombies aren't that horrible to watch. Day was never very good to begin with and even worse in retrospect. Land's only real fault is that it comes after so many better films that were spawned by Romero's originals that it seems to be the last gasp in a long and warbling death-rattle. Still, John Leguizamo, Simon Baker and Romero are dutiful servants to the zombie ouevre, and the film doesn't ever lag or become silly. Give it a look...if it is still there by the time you read this (we were two of six people in the audience for our mid-evening screening, and this was three days after it opened...I feel confident it will do bang-up business on DVD).
AND ON DVD...
Still watching films for the upcoming festival (which is why I haven't had an entry in 10 days). And I must say, they range from well-that-was-far-better-than-I-had-anticipated to oh-dear-god-I-didn't-know-103-minutes-could-feel-like-7-hours. But as I stated earlier, I will speak about them all later, at the end of August.
wanta fanta?
